We use cookies to provide you with the best possible website experience. This includes cookies that are necessary for the operation of the site, as well as cookies used for anonymous statistics, comfort settings, or displaying personalized content. You can decide which categories you want to allow. Please note that depending on your settings, some features of the website may not be available.

Cookie settings

These necessary cookies are required to enable the core functionality of the website. Opting out of these cookies is not possible.

cb-enable
This cookie stores the user's cookie consent status for the current domain. Expiry: 1 year.
laravel_session
Stores the session ID to recognize the user when the page reloads and to restore their login session. Expiry: 2 hours.
XSRF-TOKEN
Provides CSRF protection for forms. Expiry: 2 hours.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 18779
July 2026
Why the Dragon and the Elephant Diverged: State Capability, Structural Transformation & Inclusive Development in China and India

China and India embarked on planned development at roughly the same time and had comparable per capita incomes about four decades ago. Yet they have since diverged sharply in economic growth, human development and inequality. This paper examines the sources of that divergence. It first analyses the contrasting trajectories of agricultural growth. Following agrarian reforms after 1980, China sustained much faster agricultural growth, strengthening rural incomes and domestic demand. India's agrarian transformation remained incomplete, with lasting consequences for growth and structural change. The paper then argues that deeper institutional differences explain the widening gap. It examines divergences in governance, state capability and administrative capacity, investment in education, and growth strategies, particularly the extent to which growth generated productive employment. These factors shaped both the pace and inclusiveness of development. The paper concludes by showing how differences in agricultural transformation, state capability, human capital formation and employment-intensive growth contributed to the contrasting trajectories of inequality in the two countries.

Kommunikation
Mark Fallak
mark.fallak@liser.lu
+352 585-855-526
World of Labour
Olga Nottmeyer
olga.nottmeyer-ext@liser.lu
+352 585-855-501
Netzwerkkoordination
Christina Gathmann
christina.gathmann@liser.lu

Das IZA@LISER-Netzwerk ist eine weltweite Gemeinschaft für exzellente Forschung in der Arbeitsmarktökonomie und angrenzenden Fachgebieten. Nach dem Wechsel von Bonn wird das Netzwerk nun am Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER) koordiniert.

Über das IZA@LISER Network
Contact
IZA@LISER NETWORK (Current Site Operator):

Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER)
11, Porte des Sciences
Maison des Sciences Humaines
L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette / Belval, Luxembourg

IZA Institute (In Liquidation):

Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH i. L.
Schaumburg-Lippe-Str. 5-9, 53113 Bonn. Germany
Phone: +49 228 3894-0 | Fax: +49 228 3894-510
E-Mail: info@iza.org | Web: www.iza.org
Represented by: Martin T. Clemens (Liquidator)