The IZA Discussion Paper Series (ISSN: 2365-9793) disseminates high-quality research by IZA network members to the scientific community and the interested public worldwide before they are later published in academic journals. Comprising over 16,000 papers, IZA's publication flagship is the most influential working paper series in labor economics.

Submission guidelines for authors

Subscribe to new paper alerts

Search by:

Please provide a valid Search.
Search tips
Wildcard

The character * can be used as a wildcard. For example: *berg

Filter

Type
Type
27 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 16362
Contested Transparency: Digital Monitoring Technologies and Worker Voice
Filippo Belloc, Gabriel Burdin, Stefano Dughera, Fabio Landini
IZA Discussion Paper No. 16233
External Pay Transparency and the Gender Wage Gap
Wolfgang Frimmel, Bernhard Schmidpeter, Rene Wiesinger, Rudolf Winter-Ebmer
IZA Discussion Paper No. 15817
The Ongoing Impact of Gender Pay Gap Transparency Legislation
Melanie K. Jones, Ezgi Kaya, Kerry L. Papps
IZA Discussion Paper No. 15363
Can Wage Transparency Alleviate Gender Sorting in the Labor Market?
Omar Bamieh, Lennart Ziegler
IZA Discussion Paper No. 15342
Organisational Gender Pay Gaps in the UK: What Happened Post-transparency?
Melanie K. Jones, Ezgi Kaya
IZA Discussion Paper No. 14940
Transparency of the Welfare System and Labor Market Outcomes of Unemployed Workers
Sofie Cairo, Robert Mahlstedt
substantially revised version published as 'The disparate effects of information provision: A field experiment on the work incentives of social welfare' in: Journal of Public Economics, 2023, 226, 104987
IZA Discussion Paper No. 14206
The Austrian Pay Transparency Law and the Gender Wage Gap
René Böheim, Sarah Gust
IZA Discussion Paper No. 13746
Committee Decision-Making under the Threat of Leaks
Sebastian Fehrler, Volker Hahn
forthcoming in: Journal of Politics
IZA Discussion Paper No. 13635
Pay Transparency Initiative and Gender Pay Gap: Evidence from Research-Intensive Universities in the UK
Danula K. Gamage, Georgios Kavetsos, Sushanta Mallick, Almudena Sevilla
IZA Discussion Paper No. 12794
Working Conditions, Transparency, and Compliance in Global Value Chains: Evidence from Better Work Jordan
Raymond Robertson
IZA Discussion Paper No. 12684
Does Increased Teacher Accountability Decrease Leniency in Grading?
Patrick A. Puhani, Philip Yang
published in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2020, 171, 333 - 341
IZA Discussion Paper No. 12221
NDC: The Generic Old-Age Pension Scheme
Marek Góra, Edward Palmer
forthcoming as a chapter in: "Progress and Challenges of Nonfinancial Defined Pension"
IZA Discussion Paper No. 10856
Governance and Public Service Delivery in India
Farzana Afridi
published as: International Growth Centre Synthesis Paper, 2017
IZA Discussion Paper No. 10683
Is Transparency an Anti-Corruption Myth?
Cameron K. Murray, Paul Frijters, Markus Schaffner
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9947
Image versus Information: Changing Societal Norms and Optimal Privacy
S. Nageeb Ali, Roland Benabou
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9925
Can Transparency of Information Reduce Embezzlement? Experimental Evidence from Tanzania
Salvatore Di Falco, Brice Magdalou, David Masclet, Marie Claire Villeval, Marc Willinger
revised version published as 'Embezzlement: Does transparency of information matter?' in: Review of Behavioral Economics, 2020, 7(2), 103-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000119
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9894
Improving the Peer Review Process: A Proposed Market System
Paul Frijters, Benno Torgler
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9890
Regulation and Firm Value: Curious Case of Transparency and Disclosure Laws in Russia
Suman Banerjee, Ronald Masulis, Sarmistha Pal
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9027
How Transparency Kills Information Aggregation: Theory and Experiment
Sebastian Fehrler, Niall Hughes
published in: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2018, 10, 181-209
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9000
The Meaning of Failed Replications: A Review and Proposal
Michael A. Clemens
published in: Journal of Economic Surveys, 2017, 31 (1), 326-342
Type
Display
20 50 100
Type
  • 1
  • 2