We use cookies to provide you with the best possible website experience. This includes cookies that are necessary for the operation of the site, as well as cookies used for anonymous statistics, comfort settings, or displaying personalized content. You can decide which categories you want to allow. Please note that depending on your settings, some features of the website may not be available.

Cookie settings

These necessary cookies are required to enable the core functionality of the website. Opting out of these cookies is not possible.

cb-enable
This cookie stores the user's cookie consent status for the current domain. Expiry: 1 year.
laravel_session
Stores the session ID to recognize the user when the page reloads and to restore their login session. Expiry: 2 hours.
XSRF-TOKEN
Provides CSRF protection for forms. Expiry: 2 hours.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 19028
October 2026
Do Criminally Accused Politicians Widen the Gender Gap in Science Choice? Evidence from India

Gender gaps in educational participation can mask inequality in what women and men study, with consequences for later education and employment. We study whether criminal political representation contributes to such sorting at India's higher-secondary level, where science is the principal route to tertiary STEM education. Using nationally representative surveys, candidate affidavits, election results, and school-availability data, we instrument criminal political representation using close contests between candidates who differ in accusation status. We find that criminal political representation widens female disadvantage in science choice but has no discernible effect on the enrolment gender gap. A one-standard-deviation increase in the share of criminally accused politicians widens the science gap by 5--7 percentage points, with girls shifting toward arts/humanities. The adverse effect is larger where fewer schools offer science. Criminal political representation also increases perceived harassment of unmarried girls, while prior harassment is associated with a wider female disadvantage in science choice. Political selection can thus alter the composition of female human capital even when educational participation is unchanged.

Kommunikation
Mark Fallak
mark.fallak@liser.lu
+352 585-855-526
World of Labour
Olga Nottmeyer
olga.nottmeyer-ext@liser.lu
+352 585-855-501
Netzwerkkoordination
Christina Gathmann
christina.gathmann@liser.lu

Das IZA@LISER-Netzwerk ist eine weltweite Gemeinschaft für exzellente Forschung in der Arbeitsmarktökonomie und angrenzenden Fachgebieten. Nach dem Wechsel von Bonn wird das Netzwerk nun am Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER) koordiniert.

Über das IZA@LISER Network
Contact
IZA@LISER NETWORK (Current Site Operator):

Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER)
11, Porte des Sciences
Maison des Sciences Humaines
L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette / Belval, Luxembourg

IZA Institute (In Liquidation):

Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH i. L.
Schaumburg-Lippe-Str. 5-9, 53113 Bonn. Germany
Phone: +49 228 3894-0 | Fax: +49 228 3894-510
E-Mail: info@iza.org | Web: www.iza.org
Represented by: Martin T. Clemens (Liquidator)