We use cookies to provide you with the best possible website experience. This includes cookies that are necessary for the operation of the site, as well as cookies used for anonymous statistics, comfort settings, or displaying personalized content. You can decide which categories you want to allow. Please note that depending on your settings, some features of the website may not be available.

Cookie settings

These necessary cookies are required to enable the core functionality of the website. Opting out of these cookies is not possible.

cb-enable
This cookie stores the user's cookie consent status for the current domain. Expiry: 1 year.
laravel_session
Stores the session ID to recognize the user when the page reloads and to restore their login session. Expiry: 2 hours.
XSRF-TOKEN
Provides CSRF protection for forms. Expiry: 2 hours.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 17100
June 2024
The Failed History of Quarantines, and Its Implications for Public Health

This paper reviews the history of the practice of quarantines, rediscovering the 19th century 'Sanitarian' movement in Britain that sprang from a recognition that quarantines had failed to stop the spread of diseases and were not cost-effective. To our knowledge, the key figure among the Sanitarians was Charles Maclean, who conducted the first cost-benefit analysis of quarantines. MacLean heavily influenced, among others, Southwood Smith and Edwin Chadwick, who, together with Jeremy Bentham, championed reforms that form part of the Public Health Act of 1848, which led to the primacy of sanitation efforts (such as pressurised water supply, sewage management, and garbage collection and safe disposal) in public health policy in the UK and elsewhere. Maclean convinced the Sanitarians that quarantines were not grounded in health science but instead formed part of the business model of a public health bureaucracy uninterested in public health and which was prepared to falsify and ignore data to survive. Arguably, the same can be said today with the modern version of quarantines being the Covid lockdowns of 2020-2021. We sketch a few preliminary institutional options for freeing public health efforts from bureaucratic expansion and mission drift and tethering them more robustly to the public interest.

Communications
Mark Fallak
mark.fallak@liser.lu
+352 585-855-526
World of Labour
Olga Nottmeyer
olga.nottmeyer@liser.lu
+352 585-855-501
Network Coordination
Christina Gathmann
christina.gathmann@liser.lu

The IZA@LISER Network is a global community of scholars dedicated to excellence in labor economics and related fields, now coordinated at the Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER) following its transition from Bonn.

About IZA@LISER Network
Contact
IZA Network (Current Site Operator):

Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER)
11, Porte des Sciences
Maison des Sciences Humaines
L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette / Belval, Luxembourg

IZA Institute (In Liquidation):

Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH i. L.
Schaumburg-Lippe-Str. 5-9, 53113 Bonn. Germany
Phone: +49 228 3894-0 | Fax: +49 228 3894-510
E-Mail: info@iza.org | Web: www.iza.org
Represented by: Martin T. Clemens (Liquidator)