The IZA Discussion Paper Series (ISSN: 2365-9793) disseminates high-quality research by IZA network members to the scientific community and the interested public worldwide before they are later published in academic journals. Comprising more than 17,000 papers, IZA's publication flagship is the most influential working paper series in labor economics.

Submission guidelines for authors

Subscribe to new paper alerts

Search by:

Please provide a valid Search.
Search tips
Wildcard

The character * can be used as a wildcard. For example: *berg

Filter

Type
Type
27 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2097
Wage Inequality and Job Insecurity among Permanent and Contract Workers in India: Evidence from Organized Manufacturing Industries
Amit Kumar Bhandari, Almas Heshmati
published in: ICFAI Journal of Applied Economics, 2008, 7(1), 80-111
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1869
Job Insecurity and Youth Emancipation: A Theoretical Approach
Sascha O. Becker, Samuel Bentolila, Ana Fernandes, Andrea Ichino
published in: B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Contribution to Economic Analysis and Policy, 2008, 8 (1), Article 19
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1836
Youth Emancipation and Perceived Job Insecurity of Parents and Children
Sascha O. Becker, Samuel Bentolila, Ana Fernandes, Andrea Ichino
published in: Journal of Population Economics, 2010, 23 (3), 1047-1071
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1489
Job Security and Job Protection
Andrew E. Clark, Fabien Postel-Vinay
published in: Oxford Economic Papers, 2009, 61 (2), 207-239
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1404
The Political Economy of Job Protection and Income Redistribution
Bruno Amable, Donatella Gatti
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1046
Job Insecurity and Children’s Emancipation
Sascha O. Becker, Samuel Bentolila, Ana Fernandes, Andrea Ichino
published in: Journal of Population Economics, 2010, 23 (3), 1047-1071
IZA Discussion Paper No. 65
Grime and Punishment: Insecurity and Wage Arrears in the Russian Federation
Hartmut Lehmann, Jonathan Wadsworth, Alessandro Acquisti
published in: Journal of Comparative Economics, 27 (1999), 595-617
Type
Display
20 50 100
Type
  • 1
  • 2