TY  - RPRT
        AU  - Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah
AU  - Trieu, Chi
AU  - Willrodt, Jana
        TI  - Perceived Fairness and Consequences of Affirmative Action Policies
        PY  - 2020/Apr/
        PB  - Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
        CY  - Bonn
        T2  - IZA Discussion Paper
        IS  - 13202
        UR  - https://www.iza.org/publications/dp13202
        AB  - Debates about affirmative action often revolve around fairness. Accordingly, we document substantial heterogeneity in the fairness perception of various affirmative action policies. But do these differences translate into different consequences? In a laboratory experiment, we study three different quota rules that favor individuals whose performance is low, either due to bad luck (discrimination), low productivity, or choice of a short working time. Higher fairness perceptions coincide with a higher willingness to compete and less retaliation against winners. No policy harms overall efficiency or post-competition teamwork. Furthermore, individuals seem to internalize the normbehind the policies that are perceived as fairest.
        KW  - tournament
KW  - affirmative action
KW  - fairness ideals
KW  - experiment
KW  - real effort
        ER  -