@TechReport{iza:izadps:dp3629,
            	author={Drinkwater, Stephen and Latreille, Paul L. and Knight, Ben},
            	title={When It's (Mostly) the Taking Part that Counts: The Post-Application Consequences of Employment Tribunal Claims},
            	year={2008},
	month={Aug},
            	institution={Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)},
            	address={Bonn},
            	type={IZA Discussion Paper},
            	number={3629},
            	url={https://www.iza.org/index.php/publications/dp3629},
	abstract={This paper uses the 2003 Survey of Employment Tribunal Applications to examine the post-application employment consequences for individuals registering complaints to Employment Tribunals following dismissal or redundancy. In examining this issue, we consider a number of pieces of evidence: (i) the probability of finding another job; (ii) the time taken to get a new job and (iii) the pay/status of the new job. It is found that age plays a significant role in aspects (i) and (iii), whilst those who previously held managerial positions generally took longest to get a new job and found it most difficult to achieve a similar level of pay/status in their current jobs. Long-term health problems/disability is associated with significantly worse outcomes on all three measures. Respondents whose cases were dismissed by the tribunals without hearings fared worst in terms of obtaining a new job and the time it took to do so compared with other outcomes. There were, however, fewer differences by outcome in the relative pay/status of the claimant’s current job.},
	keywords={job search;job separations;employment tribunals},
            }