%0 Report %A Gall, Thomas %A Hu, Xiaocheng %A Vlassopoulos, Michael %T Dynamic Incentive Effects of Team Formation: Experimental Evidence %D 2016 %8 2016 Nov %I Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) %C Bonn %7 IZA Discussion Paper %N 10393 %U https://www.iza.org/index.php/publications/dp10393 %X Optimal team composition has been the focus of exhaustive analysis, academic and otherwise. Yet, much of this analysis has ignored possible dynamic effects: e.g., anticipating that team formation is based on prior performance will affect prior performance. We test this hypothesis in a lab experiment with two stages of a real effort task. Participants first work individually without monetary incentives and are then assigned to teams of two where compensation is based on team performance. Our results are consistent with a simple investment-cum-matching model: pairing the worst performing individuals with the best yields 20% lower first stage effort than random matching. Pairing the best with the best, however, yields 5% higher first stage effort than random matching. In line with the theory the latter result is more pronounced when the task has less scope for learning-by-doing. Moreover, pairing the best with the best achieves the same effort response as having explicit monetary incentives in the first stage. %K matching %K team formation %K performance %K dynamic incentives