125 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 7135
revised version published in: European Journal of Population, 2014, 30 (1), 35-63
IZA Discussion Paper No. 6923
published in: World Bank Economic Review, 2015, 29 (2), 385-412
IZA Discussion Paper No. 6826
published as 'Financial Shocks and Labor: Facts and Theories' in: IMF Economic Review, 2013, 61 (4), 631-663
IZA Discussion Paper No. 6468
published in: Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2014, 29 (1), 1-21
IZA Discussion Paper No. 6115
published in: Applied Economics Letters, 2012, 19 (17), 1663-1665
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5797
published in: Economic Modelling, 2011, 28 (5), 2271-2281
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5681
published in: World Development, 2013, Vol (41), 31-50
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5558
published in: Journal of Development Economics, 2012, 99 (2), 330-340.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5499
revised version published as 'Can Secondary Jobs Smooth Consumption? Evidence from Unanticipated Wage Arrears' in: Economic Development and Cultural Changes, 2019, 67 (3), 571-594.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5321
published as 'Optimal public sector wages' in: Economic Journal, 2015, 125 (587), 1425-1451.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5023
published in: Labour Economics, 2010, 17 (6), 1038-1049
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4753
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4692
published in: Oxford Development Studies, 2012, 40 (3), 381-404
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4601
completely revised version published as IZA DP No. 5360
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4537
published in: Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2013, 53 (3), 221-237
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4494
published in: Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2012, 21 (3), 409 - 469
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4494
published in: Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2012, 21 (3), 409 - 469
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4415
published in: Journal of Urban Economics, 2010, 67(1), 103-15
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4365
published in: Review of Economic Studies, 2014, 81 (2), 787-817 (Note: Article has been retracted by the authors because the original findings cannot be replicated, likely as a result of an inadvertent coding error)