<
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
Behavioral and Personnel Economics
What makes some employment relationships successful, and causes others to fail? What is the role of government and the law in enhancing the performance of existing and new employment relationships? These are key questions for personnel economics. Its primary goal is to understand the relationship between institutions and employee performance. Recent research in behavioral economics has begun to enhance our understanding of the psychological foundations of incentives. Most importantly, this research has shown that workplace performance does not depend only on the relationship between measured performance and pay, but also on many other features of the workplace environment, including employee morale, job security, and the perceived "fairness" of one's pay. Recent evidence from economics and psychology has also demonstrated that individuals’ advancement in the labor market does not solely depend on their cognitive abilities. Rather, individual preferences and personality characteristics such as risk attitudes, patience and perseverance, or extraversion, are equally important for understanding people’s educational attainment and their success in the labor market. IZA’s program area “Behavioral and Personnel Economics” analyses how to model the relationship between such psychological factors, individual workplace performance, and general labor market outcomes. The results from this research can inform both businesses and policy makers on the best strategies to manage employment relationships, and on ways to improve existing laws and regulations.
For general information about this program area, please contact: persecon@iza.org
Core members of this program area:
Dr. Steffen Altmann,
Senior Research Associate
In many important situations of economic and social life, people make choices that are embedded into a system of non-binding default rules. These default options specify what happens if a decision maker stays passive and omits making an active decision. Although from a traditional economic perspective default rules should not influence decisions, a growing body of literature documents substantial effects of default rules on behavior, e.g., in decisions on retirement savings, registration for organ donation, or purchasing of cars and other consumption goods.
The research project aims at enhancing our understanding of such default effects, their economic consequences, and policy implications. The following questions will be addressed: Why do non-binding default rules influence behavior? Are there systematic differences in the degree to which defaults affect individual behavior? How does the specification of defaults interact with other environmental factors, such as the complexity of the decision environment or the identity of the institution that implements the default rule? What are the welfare implications of default rules? In particular, can and should defaults be used as an instrument of public policy in the spirit of a “libertarian paternalistic” policy approach, and is there need for regulating the use of default rules by companies in order to protect consumers? The questions will be analyzed using a multidisciplinary approach that relies on economic theory and behavioral experiments and integrates insight from cognitive psychology and neurobiology.